ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of delayed PF and ESI deposits through Section 143(1) adjustment was unsustainable because the i...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that the limitation period for appeal commenced only when the assessee first received the ITBA screenshot revea...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that a genuine share transaction resulting in a short-term loss cannot automatically be treated as a make-belie...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted additions exceeding ₹10.57 crore made under section 56(2)(vii)(c) after finding that the Assessing Officer w...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that additions proposed by CPC under Section 143(1)(a) ceased to survive after the Assessing Officer deleted th...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Ahmedabad held that if an assessee has failed/omitted to make a claim at the time of filing of return of income the same can be claimed during the course of appellate proceedings. Accordingly, claim placed before appellate authorities allowed.
ITAT Bangalore held that dismissal of appeal by First Appellate Authority [CIT(A)] due to non-payment of advance tax unjustified as assessee was not required to pay advance tax. Hence, matter remanded back for fresh consideration.
ITAT Bangalore condones a 69-day delay in filing an appeal, citing COVID-19 as a reasonable cause. Case reassessed by CIT(A) for the 2010-11 assessment year
ITAT ruled that co-operative societies under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act qualify for Section 80P deductions, allowing for the appeal to be reconsidered.
ITAT Bangalore imposes ₹1000 fine on taxpayer for non-appearance during assessment proceedings, payable to the PM Relief Fund. Case remitted for fresh consideration
ITAT Pune invalidates unsigned NFAC order, remanding case for re-adjudication under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Case to be heard afresh.
ITAT Delhi remands Anil Dugal’s case back to Assessing Officer for failing to address Rs. 11 Cr unexplained credits and other issues due to Covid-19.
ITAT Bangalore remands Meghana Satish Shetty’s case to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, citing COVID-19 related delays and extended gaps in hearing notices.
The ITAT Nagpur discusses capital gains tax implications in ACIT Vs KSR Transport, highlighting issues in assessment and re-assessment procedures.
The ITAT Nagpur overturned an income tax disallowance in Ghalani’s case due to late filing of Form 15G/H, citing valid legal grounds.
