Case Law Details
Malatesh Begoor Nadig Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
In the case of Malatesh Begoor Nadig vs. ITO, the ITAT Bangalore addressed a 69-day delay in the filing of an appeal for the assessment year 2010-11. The delay was initially deemed unjustifiable by the CIT(A), leading to the dismissal of the appeal. However, upon review, the ITAT considered the circumstances surrounding the delay, particularly the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Supreme Court’s ruling in “Cognizance for Extension of Limitation” had excluded the period from March 15, 2020, to February 28, 2022, from the calculation of filing deadlines. Citing this precedent, the ITAT determined that the delay was due to a reasonable cause and should be condoned. Consequently, the case was remanded to the CIT(A) for reassessment in accordance with the law, taking into account the delay as justified. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the order was pronounced virtually on August 21, 2024.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT BANGALORE
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the NFAC, Delhi dated 31/05/2024 vide DIN
No. ITBA/N FAC/S/250/2024-25/1 065299599(1) for the assessment year 2010-11.
2. At the outset, we note that there was a delay of 69 days by the assessee in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT-A. The delay in filing the appeal by the assessee was not explained during the proceedings before the ld. CIT-A. Therefore, the ld. CIT-A in his order dated 31-05-2024 concluded that the appeal filed by the assessee is not maintainable. However, on perusal of the orders of authorities below, we note that the assessment was framed vide order dated 13 August 2021 and the appeal was instituted dated 20 November 2021 with the delay of 69 days. In this regard, it is important to note that there was an outbreak of covid pandemic during the period when the appeal was to be filed before the ld. CIT-A. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re reported in 134 Taxmann.com 307 has excluded the covid period for calculating the time limit for filing the appeal from 15-3- 2020 to 28-02-2022. Thus, we hold that the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee is to be excluded while calculating the deadline for filing the appeal. Hence, we are of the view that there was sufficient and reasonable cause which prevented the assessee from filing the appeal within the statutory time limit. Accordingly, the delay in the case in hand deserves to be condoned. Consequently, we are setting aside the issue to the file of the learned CIT-A for fresh adjudication as per the provisions of law after condoning the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed for statistical purposes.
3. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in court virtually on 21st day of August, 2024
