ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored bad debt, TDS/VAT disallowance, Section 80G and Section 270A issues for fresh verification by the Assessin...
Income Tax : ITAT Lucknow restored ad hoc expense disallowance for fresh examination and observed GST and TDS late fee is compensatory in natur...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur deleted a Section 68 addition, holding that genuine share transactions cannot be treated as bogus without evidence lin...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that departmental allocation of appeals cannot deny adjudication of a Section 115BAB claim and restored the matte...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that CIT(A) must first decide the validity of reassessment proceedings before remanding the matter to the Assessi...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Mumbai allowed Farrah Marker’s appeal, deleting the Section 68 addition on share sale, questioning the AO’s reliance on presumptions about penny stocks.
Mumbai ITAT dismisses tax additions on share sale gains and purchase cost, citing assessee’s documentation and accepted source in prior assessment.
Kolkata ITAT rules documented share transactions through BSE and registered broker cannot be taxed as bogus based on suspicion; upholds assessee’s evidence.
Kolkata ITAT dismisses revenue’s appeal, upholds CITA order favoring Shaleen Khemani on gifted share sale proceeds, citing lack of evidence.
Kolkata ITAT rules in favor of Gautam Kumar Pincha, setting aside addition of share sale proceeds as undisclosed income due to lack of evidence.
ITAT Kolkata rules on Gaurav Pincha’s LTCG claim, deleting additions made under Section 10(38), citing lack of specific evidence and generalised suspicion.
ITAT Chandigarh held that amount in locker being cash received on sale of flat which is already assessed to capital gain. Accordingly, addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash rightly deleted by CIT(A). Thus, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Raipur held that providing unreasonably short period of time of six days for furnishing reply vide notice issued u/s. 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act is against the mandate of law and hence liable to be set aside.
AO could not reject the LTCG Exemption claim based on mere surrounding circumstances or probabilities without presenting any legal evidence against him: ITAT
ITAT Jaipur accepts LTCG claim of Vivek Agarwal; rejects AO’s addition under Section 68, citing adequate evidence of share transactions and demat holdings.
