ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that the limitation period for appeal commenced only when the assessee first received the ITBA screenshot revea...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that a genuine share transaction resulting in a short-term loss cannot automatically be treated as a make-belie...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted additions exceeding ₹10.57 crore made under section 56(2)(vii)(c) after finding that the Assessing Officer w...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that additions proposed by CPC under Section 143(1)(a) ceased to survive after the Assessing Officer deleted th...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that an assessee following mercantile accounting must offer interest income to tax on accrual basis, irrespecti...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Mumbai rules that trading results and gross profit cannot be disturbed if purchases, sales, and payments are substantiated. Bogus purchase addition deleted.
ITAT Delhi directs inclusion of Magma Advisory Services Ltd. in Honda R&D’s comparable list, rejecting TPO’s reasons and DR’s functional disparity claims.
ITAT Bangalore remands MBM Developers Vs DCIT case for reassessment, directing the AO to verify income recognition and expense allocation.
ITAT Bangalore dismisses the appeal in Ramrao Mannaji Nandakumari Vs ITO after the assessee opts for settlement under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Pathare Prabhu CHS Ltd., allowing deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income from co-operative banks. Read details of the judgment.
ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of Borivali Jankalyan Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd., allowing deduction under Section 80P for interest income from co-operative banks.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules on undisclosed foreign accounts in the case of Manjulaben Bipinbhai Patel vs DCIT, addressing tax assessments and legal implications.
ITAT Mumbai held that receipts from maintenance and support services and additional services, without transfer of any technical knowledge, know-how, skill, etc., are not in the nature of Fee for Technical Services (FTS) and hence not taxable in India.
The assessee is engaged in the business of Manufacturing & Trading of Sarees, Salwar Suites and Dress Materials. A survey u/s 133A of the Act was carried out on the business premises of the assessee on 26.11.2014.
AO in the final order passed on 19.01.2017 however, made disallowance of weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) to the extent of 3,38,82,341/-. Aggrieved with such order of the Assessing Officer / TPO / DRP, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
