ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Mumbai held that all the conditions of slump sale as provided under section 2(42C) of the Income Tax Act read with section 50B of the Act is satisfied. Accordingly, benefit of section 50B granted and AO directed to compute the business income accordingly.
ITAT Jaipur allowed exemption under Section 54F in Goverdhan Singh Shekhawat Vs ITO despite technical non-compliance, emphasizing substance over form and judicial precedents.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of assessee, deleting a Rs 10.53 lakh cash deposit addition, citing Section 68 non-applicability to bank accounts.
The ITAT Mumbai has deleted unexplained cash credit additions for the Pitkar family, ruling Section 68 inapplicable to bank passbooks and citing genuine medical expenses.
Delhi ITAT partially allows Rohit Goel’s appeal against ACIT, addressing unexplained cash deposits, out-of-book purchases, and assessing income based on bank credits.
ITAT Mumbai overturns A.O.’s additions for alleged bogus long-term capital gains and commission, citing lack of evidence and denial of cross-examination.
ITAT Nagpur rules Prerana Samajik Sanskrutik Trust’s provisional registration was wrongly cancelled. Temporary loans, not lack of genuineness.
ITAT Delhi held that offshore supply of equipment revenue couldn’t be taxed in India. Thus, once it is not assessable even under the normal provisions, section 44BBB would also not apply. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Delhi held that approval accorded u/s. 153D in stereotype manner and single approval has been granted for various Assessment Years is invalid sanction. Thus, order passed based on invalid sanction accorded u/s. 153D is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Surat allows Section 11 exemption for Premprakash Ashram Trust, deeming belated Form 10B filing procedural, not mandatory.
