ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
The ITAT Bangalore has remanded the transfer pricing case of Andante Foods LLP, directing the firm to provide audited financials of its foreign subsidiary to justify its selection as a tested party.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore, has set aside the ex-parte assessment and appeal orders against a taxpayer after discovering all notices were sent to an old, incorrect email address.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal rules that a charitable trust’s application for 80G approval cannot be rejected for a mere clerical error in the form. The decision directs a merits-based review.
Ahmedabad ITAT rules in favor of a charitable trust, overturning the CIT(E)’s rejection of its 80G(5) application. The court found that a clerical error in the form was a technical mistake and should not be a basis for rejection without a merits review.
ITAT, Bangalore, set aside CIT(E)’s rejection of Hamza Welfare Trust’s application for permanent registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G.
Chandigarh ITAT held that CIT(A) has no power to set aside assessments passed u/s 143(3), as such power exists only for ex-parte orders u/s 144. Revenue’s appeal was allowed, and the case remanded for fresh adjudication on merits.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses an income tax appeal, ruling that an entire cash payment for land could not be taxed as an unexplained investment.
ITAT Agra rules AO’s failure to verify source of Rs.20 lakh property investment makes assessment order erroneous, upholding PCIT’s revision powers under Section 263.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules that a charitable organization’s application for tax exemption cannot be rejected solely due to a technical error in form submission without a hearing.
The ITAT Jaipur ruled that cash deposits explained by recorded sales cannot be added solely on an uncorroborated survey statement, upholding assessee’s appeal.
