Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Rejection of 12A & 80G Applications for Wrong Clause Selection Set Aside by ITAT Ahmedabad

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 8129
Case Name
Baroda Youth Federation Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
N.A.
Advertisement


Baroda Youth Federation Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Ahmedabad)

ITAT Ahmedabad Protects NGO: Technical Errors Can’t Override Eligibility for Exemption

Facts

The Assessee is a Section 8 Company engaged in charitable activities & Filed application in Form 10AB on 07.03.2024 seeking registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii). CIT(E) issued questionnaire (02.07.2024) & Assessee furnished details (17.07.2024). However, CIT(E) rejected the application (19.09.2024), treating it as non-maintainable on the ground that an earlier application had already been rejected & present one was not covered by CBDT Circular No. 07/2024 dated 25.04.2024. Without examining merits, the application was dismissed; no show-cause notice or hearing was given. Similarly, the application for 80G(5) approval was also rejected (21.09.2024), since Assessee did not hold valid registration u/s 12A/12AB, which is a statutory pre-condition.

Assessee’s Contentions

  • Wrong clause in Form 10AB was selected earlier due to portal/system error.
  • Rejection only on technical grounds, without hearing, violates principles of natural justice.
  • Cited various Tribunal decisions (Modasa Ekda Visha Khadayata Kovadia Kelavani Mandal, V-One Society, Youth Service Centre, Bhagwan Mahaveer Jain Relief Trust, Rotary Charity Trust) where similar rejections were remanded for fresh consideration.

ITAT’s Observations

  • Rejection merely on earlier dismissal & clause-selection error, without considering merits or giving opportunity of being heard, is unsustainable.
  • Precedents show that wrong clause selection due to inadvertence/system glitches should not defeat substantive rights if the trust is otherwise eligible.
  • Denial of hearing amounts to violation of natural justice.
  • Since 12A registration is a pre-condition for 80G approval, both matters must be reconsidered together.

Decision

  • Order u/s 12A rejection set aside & Matter remanded to CIT(E) with direction to treat application under correct clause, examine merits afresh, and pass reasoned order after giving adequate opportunity of hearing.
  • 80G application rejection also remanded & To be decided afresh after adjudication of 12A registration.
  • Both appeals allowed for statistical purposes.

ITAT Ahmedabad held that wrong clause selection in Form 10AB due to portal/technical error cannot be the sole basis for rejecting 12A/80G applications. Authorities must provide hearing and decide on merits, upholding principles of natural justice

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,232

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.