ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Tribunal held that the assessee’s revised application correcting an incorrect section code, filed within the CBDT extended deadline, is valid. CIT(E)’s rejection as non-maintainable was set aside.
ITAT Pune condones a 242-day delay and sets aside a tax addition on demonetisation cash deposits for a co-operative society, remitting the case for re-examination.
The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that the amendment to Section 80AC, requiring timely tax return filing for Chapter VIA deductions, is not applicable to Assessment Year 2017-18.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Kolkata has ruled in favor of Surya Agro Products Pvt. Ltd., invalidating a tax assessment for the Assessment Year 2012-13.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the tax assessment of Maruti Enterprises back to the Assessing Officer, citing a violation of natural justice.
Delhi ITAT deletes a Rs.190 Cr tax addition on share premium, citing impermissible double taxation. The ruling upholds the principle that the same income cannot be taxed twice.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore, ruled that capital gains from the sale of a property gifted by a husband to his wife must be clubbed with the husband’s income, not the wife’s, under Section 64(1)(iv) of the Income Tax Act.
Learn how the ITAT, in the Jitudan Ravatdan Gadhvi vs. ITO case, condoned a delay in appeal and overturned a best-judgment assessment, finding that the taxpayer’s cash deposits were a legitimate part of his business operations.
The ITAT in Kolkata set aside a ₹9.32 crore tax addition on share sales by Superdeal Resources, ruling that well-documented transactions are not bogus. The order underscores the need for substantive evidence over suspicion.
The ITAT in Kolkata ruled that tax claims cannot be denied on technicalities when documentation is on record. The case of Ambika Metaliks highlights the importance of fairness.
