Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jitudan Ravatdan Gadhvi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jitudan Ravatdan Gadhvi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Cash Deposits Explained by Withdrawals – ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes Addition of ₹12.44 Lakh; Deposits Not Unexplained, But Business Redeployment – ITAT Deletes Sec.68 Addition Assessee, a small contractor from Gujarat, was subjected to reassessment after AO noticed cash deposits of ₹11.94 lakh in his Bank account. As Assessee did not respond to statutory notices, AO completed a best-judgment assessment u/s 144, treating deposits as unexplained cash credits u/s 68 & adding ₹12,44,754 (including bank interest). CIT(A) dismissed the appea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930