ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the appeal after holding that mere upload of an order on the ITBA portal is not valid service under Sectio...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad deleted estimated brokerage additions based on inquiry registers and loose papers, holding that no corroborative ev...
Service Tax : Chhattisgarh HC upheld CESTATs order restricting service tax demand to the normal period under Section 73(1), finding the dispute ...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad deleted Section 69A addition as cash deposits were already accepted as business turnover under Section 44AD, avoidi...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded additions under normal provisions and Section 115JB after observing that provision write-back and security de...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi directed exclusion of Australian salary from Indian taxable income under Article 15 of the India-Australia DTAA and den...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Learn about the latest judgement from ITAT Delhi, where it upheld the disallowance of belated employee contributions to EPF/ESIC in section 143(1) income tax proceedings.
ITAT Mumbai held that the TPO is not correct in arriving at the ALP as NIL on the ground that the need and benefit test is not satisfied by the assessee without giving any contrary findings with regard to the various documents including the TP study submitted by the assessee.
ITAT Mumbai held that penalty levied for late filing of Profession Tax Return is penal in nature accordingly is not allowable as business expenditure.
In Nisarahmed Abdulsattar Vs. ITO, ITAT Ahmedabad quashes the Assessment Order for failure to collect TCS on the sale of metal scrap before the limitation period. Read the full order here.
Delve into the detailed analysis of the Monika Chitrasen Patil Vs ITO case by ITAT Pune. Understand the context, the decision, and its implications on cash payments in property transactions.
ITAT Pune’s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 39.69 Crores for Manoj Madanlal Chhajed Vs ACIT, emphasizing the absence of concrete evidence beyond the assessee’s statement and unverified documents, showcases meticulous judicial scrutiny.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that benefit of exemption under Section 11(1)(a) and 11(2) of the Income Tax Act is not available to “deemed income” under Section 11(3) of the Income Tax Act
ITAT Mumbai held that 100% addition in case of bogus purchases unsustainable. Notably, addition to the extent of rate of gross profit in case of bogus purchase is duly sustained.
Held that the interest granted by the reference Court u/s. 28 of the Land Acquisition Act from the date of possession of land till the date of judgment of High Court is an accretion of the value of the land acquired, not chargeable to tax.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the requirement of both the issuance and service of such notice upon the assessee for the purposes of Section 147 and 148 of the Act are mandatory jurisdictional requirements. Order passed is liable to be quashed on account of non-service of notice u/s 147/148.
