ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : The Mumbai ITAT held that the appellate authority failed to consider pending writ petitions and interim directions of the Bombay H...
Income Tax : The ITAT Chennai held that exemption under Section 11 cannot be denied merely because Form 10B was not filed along with the return...
Income Tax : The ITAT Bangalore held that gains arising from buyback of shares are taxable under Section 46A because the conditions prescribed ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that incomplete WhatsApp chats without proof of completed transactions cannot justify additions under Section 69A...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that penalty under Section 271AAC cannot survive once the underlying Section 153C assessment is quashed. The Tribu...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Once TDS element is reflected in Form No. 26AS, the Assessing Officer cannot allege that the parties are not genuine. Moreover, full details are available on record.
No ad hoc addition for bogus purchases should be made. Addition should be made to the extent of difference between gross profit rate on genuine purchases and GP rate on hawala purchases
Sureshkumar K Kataria Vs DCIT (ITAT Rajkot) ITAT notes that there was mismatch in the gross income reported by the assessee viz a viz the income reflecting in form 26AS for an amount of Rs. 4,13,081.00 only. As such, the assessee has shown less income by the impugned amount, therefore concurrent view was taken by […]
Kiran Roadlines Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot) The assessee is a registered firm in the business of transportation. It appears that for A.Y. 2004-05 & 2005-06 identical penalty debited to P&L account has been allowed by he Ld. CIT(A). In appeal preferred before the ITAT by the Revenue dated 06.03.2009, the Hon’ble Bench has been pleased […]
Shivdham Industries P. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Guwahati) It has been stated before us by the ld. Counsel for the assessee that in the return of income filed in Form no. ITR-6 in Schedule CFL, the assessee has furnished ‘details of loss to be carried forward to future years’ totaling to Rs. 82,89,050/- which included […]
Shail Jayesh Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) From the copy of the bank statement of Kotak Mahindra Bank, we find that assessee had deposited Rs.6 lakh in cash in 600 old currency notes of Rs. 1000 denomination on 01/12/2016. At a glance, it may appear that since the assessee had sufficient cash in hand amounting […]
Machine Tools India Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) CBDT has issued instruction from time to time to the AO’s qua the manner of processing the return and giving TDS credit. Delhi High Court in the case of Own Motion and Ors. Vs. CIT & Ors. In [2013] 352 ITR 273 (Delhi) issued seven mandamuses for […]
Hemendra Lilachand Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT noted that requirement of filing appeal before the learned CIT (A) in electronic form was new. The assessee being individual filed appeal before CIT(A) within time limit but in paper dated 18th April 2016 instead of filing online as required by the CBDT notification dated 1st March […]
Ajnara India Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It is observed that the Ld. CIT(A) examined the Lease Deed Agreement between the assessee and NOIDA Authority filed before him during the appellate proceedings and extracted the relevant recitals in para 4.8 and 4.9 of his order to reach the conclusion that reading of Lease Deed Agreement, […]
ACIT Vs Calchennai Mobile Worx P. Ltd (ITAT Chennai) As per asset purchase agreement between the assessee and the purchaser, agreed consideration for transfer of business/asset is Rs 5.76 crores. In fact, the buyer has confirmed having paid entire agreed consideration for transfer of business. The assessee claims that it has received a sum of […]
