CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive guide covering 175 legal compliances for July 2026 under FEMA, Income Tax, GST, SEBI, Companies Act, Labour Laws, ...
Income Tax : The Income-tax Act does not prescribe a single definition of "relative" for all purposes. Different provisions such as Sections 13...
Income Tax : Understand when 1% TDS applies on purchase of immovable property under Section 194-IA. Learn the Rs. 50 lakh threshold, compliance...
Income Tax : This guide explains when NRIs should use Form 128 and when payers should use Form 129 to reduce or eliminate excess TDS. It also c...
Income Tax : The article argues that Section 58(3) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 does not independently mandate books of account or tax audit for...
Income Tax : The issue was complexity in the existing tax law. It was clarified that the new Act simplifies structure by reducing sections and ...
Income Tax : This webinar breaks down the major structural and conceptual changes introduced in the new Income Tax Act, 2025. It helps professi...
Income Tax : The government informed Parliament that taxpayer-specific details of income tax searches cannot be disclosed due to confidentialit...
Income Tax : The Government clarified that the new income tax search provision does not expand powers or permit AI-based digital surveillance, ...
Income Tax : The representation highlights large-scale pendency and administrative bottlenecks under Sections 12AB and 80G, urging immediate re...
Income Tax : Madras HC set aside cognizance under the Income-tax Act, holding Section 223(1) BNSS mandates hearing the accused before cognizanc...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed a Section 148 notice, holding that a seized inquiry register without a live nexus to the assessee cannot justif...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed Section 148 reassessment as it was issued beyond Section 149 limitation, holding Section 152(3) applies to sear...
Income Tax : Madras HC held that merely issuing a corrigendum acknowledging the return did not rectify the defective assessment process and ord...
Income Tax : CBDT FAQs clarify Section 536 transition rules for summons, searches, recovery, penalties, pending 12AB/80G approvals and LDC/NDC ...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved a scientific research institution under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for tax years 2026-27 to 2030-31. The notificat...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved the University of Hyderabad for scientific research under Section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The approval i...
Income Tax : The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) approved the company under Section 35(1)(iia) for scientific research ...
Income Tax : The government enforced a tax collection assistance agreement with Japan effective from 8 July 2025. The notification enables cros...
Delhi High Court directs re-adjudication in the case of Sandeep Jain vs Union of India regarding denial of Input Tax Credit without considering the petitioner’s reply.
ITAT Mumbai held that there is a fundamental gap between guarantee and Letter of Comfort. Guarantee is a legally enforceable; however, Letter of Comfort is not. Thus, issuing Letter of Comfort to the Bankers of AE, the assessee did not incurred any cost and hence it does not constitute international transaction under section 92B of the Act
ITAT Mumbai held that denial of exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act unjustified as appellant cannot be penalized for the mistake committed by the developer/seller in allocating the flat. Thus, exemption u/s. 54 granted as all the conditions satisfied.
Bombay High Court held that as per section 14A of the Income Tax Act any expenditure incurred in relation to any income which is not included in total income would not be allowed as expenditure. Thus, interest on borrowed funds used to earn dividend which is exempt from tax cannot be allowed as expenditure.
ITAT Delhi held that once the reassessment order passed by AO is not sustainable in the eyes of law, any revision order passed u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act seeking to revise such reassessment order cannot be accepted in the eyes of law. Accordingly, revision order passed u/s. 263 quashed.
Pragati Power Corporation Ltd vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) case: Analysis of ITAT decision allowing deduction under section 80IA without offsetting losses from other Industrial Units.
Explore the Section 43B(h) amendment of the Income Tax Act, its link with the MSMED Act, and the implications for timely payments to micro and small enterprises.
ITAT Visakhapatnam has held that if working capital adjustment on ALP has been already factored in pricing/ profitability vis-à-vis that of its comparables, then, no separate upward adjustment on outstanding receivables is required.
Explore the detailed analysis of Kesar Alloys & Metals Pvt. Ltd. vs. Director of Income Tax (ITAT Indore) case, focusing on penalty levied under section 271FA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Dhirajlal Savailal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) If the receipt is not liable to tax in the hands of the recipient for any reason, the same cannot be a ground for not granting credit for TDS.
