Goods and Services Tax : GST IMS allows taxpayers to accept, reject or keep invoices pending before ITC flows to GSTR-3B, ensuring better GST ITC reconcili...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court ruled that GST authorities must mandatorily apply Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST before disallowing ITC due to return...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that Section 74 cannot be used unless fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression with intent to evade tax is specif...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn why GSTR-2B, 2A, and books differ, how mismatches occur, and the steps founders must take to claim ITC correctly and stay au...
Goods and Services Tax : How AI-powered tools streamline GSTR-2A & GSTR-2B reconciliation for Chartered Accountants. Learn about automated GST reconciliati...
Goods and Services Tax : Recent amendments in GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C have increased compliance complexity, prompting calls for extended deadlines to allow accu...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court quashed ex-parte GST adjudication orders after the taxpayer claimed it could explain discrepancies betwee...
Goods and Services Tax : The case involved denial of input tax credit solely due to return mismatch without examining records. The Court held that such mec...
Goods and Services Tax : The court addressed denial of input tax credit due to mismatch with GSTR-2A and missing invoices. It allowed the taxpayer to seek ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that passing two assessment orders for the same GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B mismatch leads to duplication and d...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court quashed a GST demand where part of the liability arose from belated ITC and part from return mismatch, directing fr...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
Madras High Court orders reconsideration of Silk Junction vs Deputy State Tax Officer case over GSTR 1 and e-way bill mismatch.
Madras HC remands GST order for reconsideration, requiring 10% tax payment within 15 days and a reply to the show cause notice before a fresh order is issued.
HC sets aside tax order, allowing petitioner to submit a response and remit 10% of the disputed amount. New decision to be issued within three months.
Madras High Court remands GST demand order for Santhinarayanan Santhoshkumar, imposing a Rs. 1.5 lakh pre-deposit condition and allowing an appeal.
Explore the Calcutta High Court ruling in Shiva Chemicals & Anr. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, focusing on Input Tax Credit (ITC) disputes.
Explore how to effectively respond to GST notices concerning discrepancies between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B. Understand key legal points and practical submissions to address these issues.
Delhi High Court rules that GST registration cancellation is not contingent on pending tax liabilities. Shri Sai Metals’ petition for cancellation was allowed.
Karnataka HC remands R.S Marketing’s case, granting a fresh hearing on ITC discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A due to non-compliance with prescribed guidelines.
Madras HC remands the case of Dhirani Metal Industries vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) for reconsideration over GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch in GST liability.
Despite submitting replies in February 2024, the petitioner was unable to participate in the personal hearing due to the closure of their shop caused by metro rail construction in the vicinity. This inability to attend the hearing led to the rejection of their reply as they did not provide the necessary profit and loss account and stock details.
