Case Law Details
J.M.D. Traders Vs Principal Commissioner of Goods And Service Tax (Delhi High Court)
In a significant ruling regarding the cancellation of Goods and Services Tax (GST) registrations, the Delhi High Court addressed the application for cancellation filed by J.M.D. Traders. The case, registered under the title J.M.D. Traders Vs Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax North Delhi, emphasizes the procedural clarity regarding the cancellation of GST registrations in light of pending liabilities.
Background of the Case
The petitioner, J.M.D. Traders, submitted an application on August 12, 2024, seeking to cancel its GST registration effective from the same date. However, the response from the GST authority was not favorable. On August 14, 2024, the Principal Commissioner issued a notice proposing to reject the cancellation application. The grounds for this notice revolved around the petitioner’s failure to provide necessary reconciliation statements and pending tax returns for July 2024, as well as to furnish an updated address for correspondence.
In light of this notice, J.M.D. Traders provided a response, but the authority deemed the explanation unsatisfactory, leading to the rejection of the cancellation request on August 21, 2024.
Fresh Application for Cancellation
Following the rejection, the petitioner filed a fresh application for cancellation on the same day, August 21, 2024, this time requesting cancellation to take effect immediately. The legal implications of GST registration cancellation were considered significant, as the court noted that such a cancellation does not exempt the taxpayer from fulfilling its tax obligations or from facing any statutory actions for previous non-compliance.
Court’s Observations
The Delhi High Court, upon reviewing the circumstances, highlighted that the cancellation of GST registration should not be contingent upon assessing the taxpayer’s outstanding liabilities. This ruling is rooted in a prior clarification issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) in circular F. No. CBEC/20/16/04/2018-GST dated October 26, 2018. The court emphasized that while a taxpayer may seek cancellation, the underlying liabilities must be settled separately, and such cancellation should not be postponed due to unresolved tax matters.
The High Court directed the GST authorities to process the petitioner’s application for cancellation promptly, within four weeks from the date of the order. The court stipulated that the petitioner must still provide necessary KYC documents and a valid address for further communications, ensuring a streamlined process for the cancellation request.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court’s decision underscores the importance of a transparent and timely process for the cancellation of GST registrations. Taxpayers should be aware that the cancellation of their GST registration does not absolve them of their tax responsibilities. Instead, this ruling reinforces the notion that applications for cancellation must be processed without undue delay, irrespective of pending liabilities.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT
1. Issue notice.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.
3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the respondent to cancel its Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration. The petitioner has applied for cancellation of its GST registration with effect from 12.08.2024 by an application dated 12.08.2024.
4. The respondent had issued a notice dated 14.08.2024 proposing to reject the petitioner’s application. The reasons indicate that the petitioner was called upon to furnish the reconciliation statement of GSTR-2A, 3B and 1M from the date of commencement of business. He was also called upon to file pending returns for the month of July 2024 and provide correct future address for correspondence with supporting documents.
5. The petitioner responded to the said notice dated 14.08.2024 but the same was found unsatisfactory. Consequently, the application of the petitioner was rejected by an order dated 21.08.2024.
6. The petitioner immediately made a fresh application dated 21.08.2024 for cancellation of its GST registration seeking cancellation with effect from the said date – 21.08.2024.
7. At the outset, it is relevant to note that the cancellation of a tax payer’s GST registration does not absolve the tax payer from discharging its liability or for any statutory non-compliance. It also does not preclude the concerned authority from taking any action for any statutory violation or for recovery of dues, if any.
8. It follows that the application for cancellation of GST registration cannot be withheld for assessing the petitioner’s liability. The same has also been clarified by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) by the circular being F. No. CBEC/20/16/04/2018-GST dated 26.10.2018.
9. In view of the above, we consider it apposite to direct the concerned authority to process the application dated 21.08.2024 of the petitioner for cancellation of its GST registration within a period of four weeks from date, bearing the aforesaid in mind. However, the petitioner is required to furnish KYC documents and provide for an address for future communications.
10. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending application also stands disposed of.
Author Bio
