Goods and Services Tax : GST IMS allows taxpayers to accept, reject or keep invoices pending before ITC flows to GSTR-3B, ensuring better GST ITC reconcili...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court ruled that GST authorities must mandatorily apply Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST before disallowing ITC due to return...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that Section 74 cannot be used unless fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression with intent to evade tax is specif...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn why GSTR-2B, 2A, and books differ, how mismatches occur, and the steps founders must take to claim ITC correctly and stay au...
Goods and Services Tax : How AI-powered tools streamline GSTR-2A & GSTR-2B reconciliation for Chartered Accountants. Learn about automated GST reconciliati...
Goods and Services Tax : Recent amendments in GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C have increased compliance complexity, prompting calls for extended deadlines to allow accu...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court held that Input Tax Credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-2A did not reflect imports and SEZ pro...
Goods and Services Tax : The assessment was based on four discrepancies: reconciliation issues between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, input tax credit (ITC) mismatch ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court ruled that ITC for FY 2018-19 cannot be denied merely because import and SEZ transactions were absent fro...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court remanded an ex parte assessment arising from a GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch after finding that the assessee ...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court set aside the GST demand for fresh adjudication after finding that the authorities had not properly examined stock ...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
Madras HC sets aside original order, directs it to be treated as SCN in Tvl. Anandh Store Vs CTO case, allowing petitioner to reply. Read full judgment.
Under Regulation 10(n), a Customs Broker is not responsible for continuous client surveillance. Once address verification is done, any client’s address change without informing authorities isn’t the broker’s fault.
Diamond Steel Vs State of Up (Allahabad High Court) – Best judgement assessment cannot be resorted to by authorities when adjudication is made under Section 74
Read detailed analysis of Madras High Court judgment in Annalakshmi Stores Vs Deputy State Tax, where assessment orders under Section 63 of GST Act were overturned due to procedural flaws.
Madras High Court sets aside GST order for not considering Perfect Assayers Pvt Ltd’s GSTR 1 and GSTR 9 statements. Case remanded for reconsideration.
Madras High Court remands tax order for Tvl. Dharieneesh Housing, citing denial of reasonable opportunity to contest GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch.
Madras High Court directs a rehearing for Tile Bros, citing procedural lapses in GST order. Petitioner gets another chance to explain tax discrepancies.
Madras High Court overturns assessment order due to non-response to show cause notice, mandates 10% tax deposit for reconsideration. Details inside.
Read the detailed analysis of Madras High Court’s judgment mandating reconsideration of 10% pre-deposit in Crystal Granites vs Asst Commissioner (ST) case.
Madras High Court sets aside the State Tax Officer’s order rejecting Elite Natural’s excess GST ITC claim due to lack of proper reasoning. Case remanded for reconsideration.
