Goods and Services Tax : GST IMS allows taxpayers to accept, reject or keep invoices pending before ITC flows to GSTR-3B, ensuring better GST ITC reconcili...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court ruled that GST authorities must mandatorily apply Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST before disallowing ITC due to return...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that Section 74 cannot be used unless fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression with intent to evade tax is specif...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn why GSTR-2B, 2A, and books differ, how mismatches occur, and the steps founders must take to claim ITC correctly and stay au...
Goods and Services Tax : How AI-powered tools streamline GSTR-2A & GSTR-2B reconciliation for Chartered Accountants. Learn about automated GST reconciliati...
Goods and Services Tax : Recent amendments in GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C have increased compliance complexity, prompting calls for extended deadlines to allow accu...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court held that Input Tax Credit could not be denied merely because GSTR-2A did not reflect imports and SEZ pro...
Goods and Services Tax : The assessment was based on four discrepancies: reconciliation issues between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, input tax credit (ITC) mismatch ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court ruled that ITC for FY 2018-19 cannot be denied merely because import and SEZ transactions were absent fro...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court remanded an ex parte assessment arising from a GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch after finding that the assessee ...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court set aside the GST demand for fresh adjudication after finding that the authorities had not properly examined stock ...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
Explore the Calcutta High Court ruling in Shiva Chemicals & Anr. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, focusing on Input Tax Credit (ITC) disputes.
Explore how to effectively respond to GST notices concerning discrepancies between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B. Understand key legal points and practical submissions to address these issues.
Delhi High Court rules that GST registration cancellation is not contingent on pending tax liabilities. Shri Sai Metals’ petition for cancellation was allowed.
Karnataka HC remands R.S Marketing’s case, granting a fresh hearing on ITC discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A due to non-compliance with prescribed guidelines.
Madras HC remands the case of Dhirani Metal Industries vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) for reconsideration over GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch in GST liability.
Despite submitting replies in February 2024, the petitioner was unable to participate in the personal hearing due to the closure of their shop caused by metro rail construction in the vicinity. This inability to attend the hearing led to the rejection of their reply as they did not provide the necessary profit and loss account and stock details.
Read the Madras High Court’s judgment setting aside an unreasoned GST demand order against Ford India, citing GSTR 9 and GSTR 2A mismatches. Full text included.
Madras HC remands Orient Electricals & Engineers India’s case on GST liability and ITC reversal for reconsideration, highlighting procedural fairness and 12.5% pre-deposit.
Explore the Madras High Court’s decision in Banyan Engineers Contractors Vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 regarding GST liabilities and the necessity of court intervention. Read the full text of the judgment here.
Madras High Court directs GST order imposing additional liabilities beyond the show cause notice to be treated as a fresh SCN. Full judgment details inside.
