Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
In the SICOM Limited vs. Sundaresh Bhat case, the Appellant’s U/s. 60(5) Application was accepted. Learn why Section 42’s limitation doesn’t apply.
Essjay Ericsson Private Limited Vs Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) When the limitation has extended by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the orders noted above, for a period covering extension of limitation neither application is required nor there is any discretion of Court or Tribunal to consider sufficiency of delay. We are […]
he DC notes that the Indian Institution of Valuers, a registered society was recognized by IBBI on 20.04.2018. As per Rule 12(3) of the Valuers Rules, the RVO which is an entity under proviso to sub-rule (1), i.e., a society or a trust, then within period of one year, conversion of such entity into a […]
Kanchan Nanubhai Desai Personal Guarantor Vs Finquest Financial Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT, Delhi) There cannot be any dispute with the statutory scheme as contained in Section 97 that when Application is filed by the Resolution Professional under Section 95, the Adjudicating Authority shall direct the Board within seven days of the date of […]
Vinayak K Deshpande Vs Nexo Industries P Ltd (NCLAT Chennai) In view of the fact that the Settlement Agreement has been entered into between the parties and based on the said Agreement, the subject matter is issue is resolved between the parties, as informed by the Learned Counsels appearing for the parties, this ‘Tribunal’, dismisses […]
NCLT dismisses IBC petition by Anil Vora HUF against Kavya Build-Con. Retirement claim not maintainable under Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code.
Devarajan Raman Vs Bank of India Limited (Supreme Court of India) The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has issued a circular on 12 June 2018. The circular, inter alia, requires the insolvency professional to ensure that the fees payable to him during the CIRP are reasonable and the approval of the CoC for the […]
HC held that the IT Department is not entitled to issue notice against the Corporate Debtor for unpaid tax claims after the approval of the resolution plan by the adjudicating authority.
Since assessee had initiated the insolvency proceedings against the Corporate Debtor only as a recovery mechanism to recover dues of ‘listing fees’ however, IB Code was not meant for recovery of dues of creditors.
ABSTRACT A company has indeterminate growth by law. There is, however, a constant threat to its life from the ‘market’. It loses business to others when it fails to compete with its peers. Every other company is its predator – a company swallows another company for its own growth, through a variety of hostile or […]
