Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
To strengthen functioning of IBC, changes to Code are being considered in relation to admission of corporate insolvency resolution process (CHIP) applications, streamlining the insolvency resolution process, recasting the liquidation process, and role of service providers under Code.
A group insolvency framework that is voluntary, flexible and enabling in nature should be provided under the Code. Such a framework may be introduced in phases. In the first phase, only provisions governing domestic group insolvency may be enacted.
NCLT Delhi ordered to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated against the Corporate Debtor, as the Corporate Debtor duly admitted the liability.
NCLT Mumbai approved the resolution plan submitted by the resolution applicant Adani Goodhomes Private Limited as the plan was in accord with the Code and the application regulations framed thereunder.
Bombay High Court held that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) suspending registration of registered valuer merely because criminal proceeding is initiated against the valuer is untenable in law.
DC notes that irrespective of numerous reminders dated 11.03.2022, 09.05.2022 and 11.05.2022 sent to Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Verma for providing documents and furnish records, he did not cooperate with IA in the conduct of inspection.
The DC notes that in the CIRP-4 filed by Mr. Subrata Monindranath Maity with the Board on 16.04.2021, he had stated that ‘Number of persons who were ineligible as per Section 29 (A) – 0’ whereas in the 15th CoC meeting held on 11.02.2021 (prior to submission of CIRP – 4 form), it is mentioned […]
HC held that There is no absolute bar against a lawsuit or legal proceedings continuing concurrently with liquidation proceedings under Section 33(5) of IBC (Liquidation Moratorium), unlike Section 14 of IBC (CIRP Moratorium).
As relates Section 5 of the Limitation Act showing ‘sufficient cause’ is the only criterion for condoning delay. ‘Sufficient Cause’ is the cause for which a party could not be blamed.
SEBI released a consultation paper on modalities of Insolvency and Bankruptcy law, when process was applied to publicly listed companies.
