Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Delhi High Court’s judgment clarifies that IBC proceedings don’t preclude court jurisdiction for Section 11 applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Read the detailed analysis of Namdev Hindurao Patil’s appeal against his ineligibility to submit a resolution plan for Warana Dairy. Learn how the NCLAT dismissed his plea.
Regarding Section 14 of the IBC, court clarified that moratorium only applies to corporate debtor, not to natural persons like directors for their vicarious liability.
Analysis of Pooja Mehra vs Victory Ace case before NCLAT Delhi. Understanding IBC time limits, belated claims, and implications for creditors. Detailed judgment breakdown.
NCLT Kolkata rules it cannot annul an arbitral award during an IBC moratorium. Detailed analysis of Mahavir Industrial Corporation vs Hindustan Controls & Equipment Pvt Ltd.
Delve into the legal intricacies of New Era Propcon Pvt. Ltd. vs SREI Equipment Finance Ltd. case at NCLAT Delhi. Detailed analysis, implications, and conclusions explored.
Delve into the NCLT Kolkata case of Mittson Fille Enterprise vs. Sammaan Ventures Limited regarding share application money and financial debt under the IBC. Analysis of key arguments and findings.
Appellant has failed to establish how a larger public interest is involved warranting disclosure of requested information. Merely being students of the university do not trigger a larger public interest, warranting disclosure of information which is exempted under section 8(1)(d).
Explore the RTI appeal decision involving Yogesh Kumar Gupta and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, detailing the challenges and conclusions under the RTI Act.
In a recent RTI appeal, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India upheld the decision to deny the disclosure of valuation exam papers, citing public interest concerns.
