Advance for Share Allotment Not a Financial Debt under IBC: NCLT

Mittson Fille Enterprise Vs Sammaan Ventures Limited (NCLT Kolkata)

The case of Mittson Fille Enterprise vs. Sammaan Ventures Limited, heard before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Kolkata, presents a complex legal scenario involving the interpretation of financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). This case revolves around a petition filed by Mittson Fille Enterprise, a financial creditor, seeking the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Sammaan Ventures Limited, the corporate debtor. The crux of the dispute lies in determining whether the amount advanced by Mittson Fille Enterprise constitutes a financial debt within the ambit of the IBC.

Background: Sammaan Ventures Limited, the corporate debtor, allegedly defaulted on a substantial sum owed to Mittson Fille Enterprise, comprising both principal and interest. The default arose from the corporate debtor’s failure to complete the procedure for the allotment of shares, despite significant investments made by the financial creditor. Mittson Fille Enterprise contends that the amount advanced for the allotment of shares should be considered a financial debt under the IBC.

Legal Arguments: The legal arguments presented by both parties revolve around the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and judicial precedents. Mittson Fille Enterprise asserts that the amount advanced for the allotment of shares falls within the definition of financial debt under the IBC, citing provisions of the Companies Act and legal precedents supporting their claim. On the other hand, Sammaan Ventures Limited argues that the amount advanced constitutes an interest-free loan maturing after ten years, and therefore, does not qualify as a financial debt under the IBC. They rely on legal judgments and statutory provisions to support their contention.

Analysis: The NCLT Kolkata meticulously analyzed the arguments presented by both parties and scrutinized relevant legal precedents and statutory provisions. Central to the analysis was the determination of whether the amount advanced by Mittson Fille Enterprise for the allotment of shares constitutes a financial debt under the IBC. The tribunal considered the nature of the transaction, the intentions of the parties involved, and the legal framework governing such transactions.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.