Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Get insights into the NCLT Mumbai judgment regarding detention charges as operational debts under the IBC. Detailed analysis of ABC India Ltd. Vs Prabhakar Engineers Pvt. Ltd. case.
Read the detailed order by IBBI Disciplinary Committee regarding alleged contraventions by Manish Kumar Gupta in a corporate insolvency resolution process.
Analyzing the clash between India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), and their impact on asset resolution.
In the State Bank of India vs. Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Pvt. Ltd. case, NCLAT Delhi grants time for rejoinder with a cost of Rs. 25,000, dismissing other directives.
Explore the detailed analysis of disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India against Anil Goel, examining alleged contraventions, submissions, and final findings.
Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of key judgments explained.
NCLAT Chennai rules against FLSmidth Pvt Ltd, stating liquidator lacks authority to decide matters involving claims and counterclaims in insolvency cases.
NCLAT held that CoC’s decision not to liquidate did not constitute a modification of resolution plan and extension of time for payment was reasonable.
NCLAT Chennai held that liability arising from a recovery certificate constitutes a financial debt under IBC. Therefore, application filed by PARAS is not barred by limitation.
The IBBI Disciplinary Committee’s order on 14th May 2024 addresses violations by Insolvency Professional Ankit Gupta in the CIRP of Beoworld Pvt Ltd.
