Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arjun Chandra Barman Vs Commissioner of C.G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arjun Chandra Barman Vs Commissioner of C.G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) In Arjun Chandra Barman vs Commissioner CGST and Central Excise CESTAT Kolkata, the appellant challenged an order confirming a service tax demand of ₹6,69,399 along with interest, penalties, and late fee. The demand was raised based on discrepancies between Income Tax Returns/Form 26AS and ST-3 returns for the financial year 2016–17. The adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) had upheld the demand. The appellant contended that he owned four trucks and provided transportation services in his ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930