Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Jupiter International Limited (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Jupiter International Limited (ITAT Kolkata) ₹6.70 Cr share application addition deleted as AY 2009-10 was an unabated year no incriminating material was found; third-party statement cannot be incriminating material u/s 153A A search u/s 132 was conducted on Jupiter Group on 24.03.2015. For AY 2009-10, the assessment had already been completed earlier & the time limit to issue notice u/s 143(2) had expired. Hence, AY 2009-10 was an “unabated year” on the date of search. In the original 153A/143(3) assessment, AO made an addition of ₹6,70,00,000 treating share application mo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031