Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Jupiter International Limited (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Jupiter International Limited (ITAT Kolkata) ₹6.70 Cr share application addition deleted as AY 2009-10 was an unabated year no incriminating material was found; third-party statement cannot be incriminating material u/s 153A A search u/s 132 was conducted on Jupiter Group on 24.03.2015. For AY 2009-10, the assessment had already been completed earlier & the time limit to issue notice u/s 143(2) had expired. Hence, AY 2009-10 was an “unabated year” on the date of search. In the original 153A/143(3) assessment, AO made an addition of ₹6,70,00,000 treating share application mo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SCN u/s 74 GST Valid Even if Based on Material from Alleged Illegal Search: Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: Karnataka HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void: Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031