Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kshitij Interiors Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Kshitij Interiors Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Survey Disclosure Accepted in Return Cannot Trigger Section 270A Penalty: ITAT Mumbai Deletes 200% Misreporting Penalty The Mumbai ITAT (“E” Bench) allowed the appeal of Kshitij Interiors Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2017-18 and deleted the penalty of ₹1.03 crore levied under section 270A(8) for alleged misreporting of income. A survey under section 133A was conducted during the relevant previous year, during which the assessee disclosed cash receipts of ₹1.56 crore. The assessee subsequently offered this amount to tax in its return of income filed...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031