Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Maragathamani Shanmugam (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Maragathamani Shanmugam (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai Upholds Deletion of ₹2 Crore Addition u/s 69; Quashes Extended 153A Jurisdiction for AY 2013-14 Based on Third-Party Loose Sheets The Chennai Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeals and upheld the CIT(A)’s order deleting the addition of ₹2 crore made u/s 69 as unexplained investment for AY 2013-14. The Tribunal held that the addition was impermissibly based on uncorroborated loose sheets seized from a third-party premises and a third-party statement, neither of which established that the assessee individually made th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031