Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : G K Properties Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-2021
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
G K Properties Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Outstanding Property Consideration Subsequently Paid Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Money u/s 69A The Hyderabad Bench (SMC) of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2020-21 and deleted the addition of ₹20 lakh made under section 69A. The Assessing Officer had treated the outstanding balance shown in the balance sheet towards purchase of two immovable properties as unexplained money, relying solely on the recital in the sale deeds that full consideration had been received by the seller. The Tribunal observed that although the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031