Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No Section 271(1)(c) penalty if debatable issue is involved: ITAT Pune

Case Law Details

Case Name
DCIT Vs Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2010-11
Advertisement DCIT Vs Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav (ITAT Pune) 1. Facts of the Case Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav, an individual assessee, filed his return of income for A.Y. 2010-11 under section 139(1) declaring an income of ₹77,29,880. Pursuant to a search conducted on 31.10.2010 under section 132 in the Sava Group, he was also covered and subsequently filed returns under section 153A for A.Y. 2007-08 to 2012-13. He also approached the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) under section 245C(1) offering additional income for settlement across these years. However, the ITSC, while considering hi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Saurabh Jadhav
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Amazon
Location: Pune, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 30

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *