Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav (ITAT Pune)

1. Facts of the Case

Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav, an individual assessee, filed his return of income for A.Y. 2010-11 under section 139(1) declaring an income of ₹77,29,880. Pursuant to a search conducted on 31.10.2010 under section 132 in the Sava Group, he was also covered and subsequently filed returns under section 153A for A.Y. 2007-08 to 2012-13. He also approached the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Dynamic and detail-oriented Chartered Accountancy professional with expertise in Direct Taxation, Income Tax Litigation, and Tax Compliance. I bring over three years of comprehensive experience through my articleship at Kirtane & Pandit LLP, Pune, where I excelled in: ➡️Managing scrutiny View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Belated Form 10B Rejection Is Hyper-Technical; ITAT Nagpur allows Section 11 & 12A(1)(b) exemptions ITAT Pune recalls ex-parte order due to ill health of 88-year-old appellant Assessee Not Liable for CIT(E)’s Inability to Access Files: ITAT Nagpur Section 263 Revision not permissible if Section 80P deduction allowable: ITAT Pune Delays & Non-Compliance Before Lower Authorities Warrant Sympathetic View: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031