Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Purshottam Modi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramesh Purshottam Modi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Dividend from Mutual Fund Cannot be Treated as Bogus u/s 68 – Reopening Held Change of Opinion Beyond 4 Years – ₹39.53 Cr Addition Deleted – ITAT Mumbai The assessee’s case was reopened u/s 147 based on Investigation Wing information alleging dividend stripping through JM Mutual Fund schemes. The AO treated dividend of ₹44.24 crore as fictitious and made net addition of ₹39.53 crore u/s 68 r.w.s 115BBE after allowing part of the short-term capital loss. CIT(A) upheld the reassessment and addition. The ITAT observed that the original ass...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void – Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition Reopening Notice Invalid Without Proper Section u/s 151 – ITAT Quashes Reassessment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031