Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Purshottam Modi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramesh Purshottam Modi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Dividend from Mutual Fund Cannot be Treated as Bogus u/s 68 – Reopening Held Change of Opinion Beyond 4 Years – ₹39.53 Cr Addition Deleted – ITAT Mumbai The assessee’s case was reopened u/s 147 based on Investigation Wing information alleging dividend stripping through JM Mutual Fund schemes. The AO treated dividend of ₹44.24 crore as fictitious and made net addition of ₹39.53 crore u/s 68 r.w.s 115BBE after allowing part of the short-term capital loss. CIT(A) upheld the reassessment and addition. The ITAT observed that the original ass...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031