Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Exel Rubber (P) Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Exel Rubber (P) Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Reopening U/s 148 Quashed – Seized Laptop Data from Third Person & Failure to Satisfy s.149(1)(b) Conditions Held Fatal – ITAT Hyderabad A search u/s 132 in Exel Rubber Group led to seizure of a laptop from the residence of the group’s Accounts Manager containing “Focus 5.5” software with alleged unaccounted cash transactions. Based on this material, the AO issued notice u/s 148 beyond three years and made additions towards undisclosed business receipts, adjustment purchases and unexplained money u/s 69A. CIT(A) partly sustaine...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031