Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gold Spice Impex Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Gold Spice Impex Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Explained as Recorded Cash Sales—Books Accepted; Only 10% Sustained u/s 68 for Non-Compliance; 115BBE Not Applicable for AY 2017-18 The Assessee, a wholesale spice trader, filed return declaring ₹68,540. The case was selected for scrutiny owing to large cash deposits of ₹1.15 crore on 11.11.2016, abnormal increase in sales, and mismatch in customs duty data. Though the AO repeatedly sought year-wise cash-sales/cash-deposit details and issued summons u/s 131 to the partners, the Assessee failed to respond in the pres...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031