Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vandana Jain Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vandana Jain Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) 263 Invalid When Issue Already Pending Before CIT(A) – Statutory Bar under Explanation 1(c) Applies; PCIT’s Revision on Bogus Sales Quashed The Assessee challenged three revision orders passed u/s 263 for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20. The PCIT invoked revision on the ground that the AO should have taxed the alleged accommodation-entry transactions as unexplained cash credits u/s 68, instead of estimating 0.5% commission income. The Assessee argued that the very same transactions—sales/purchases routed through Sumit Jindal group—were already under appeal befo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 50C & Section 54F Issues; CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930