Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ankush Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ankush Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Statement Alone Cannot Tax ₹9.70 Crore: ITAT Jaipur Deletes Protective Addition for Lack of Corroborative Evidence Jaipur Bench of the ITAT dealt with a case where AO made a protective addition of ₹9.70 crore on the allegation that Assessee had paid this amount in cash to one Shri Mohit Garg for purchase of gold. The foundation of the addition was only the statement of Mohit Garg recorded u/s 132(4) during search, in which he stated that he received the money from “Ankush Kumar Jain” & also mentioned a PAN number that matched the assessee’s ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SCN u/s 74 GST Valid Even if Based on Material from Alleged Illegal Search: Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: Karnataka HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void: Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031