Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jindal Saw Ltd. Vs D/ACIT (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jindal Saw Ltd. Vs D/ACIT (Delhi High Court)

In the Delhi High Court case Shreya Jain Vs Gaurav Tanwar, the petitioner challenged an income tax reassessment for the assessment year 2018-19. The dispute arose from a notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, followed by an order under Section 148A(d) and a notice under Section 148. The core issue was the inconsistency between the allegations stated in the initial notice and the grounds presented in the subsequent order. The Assessing Officer (AO) initially alleged that the petitioner had an unex

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No adverse GST Order Without Personal Hearing: Allahabad HC Canara Bank Wins ITAT Appeal: Section 115JB Not Applicable Bombay HC Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Section 144C(13) Deadline Section 115JB not applicable to banking companies: ITAT Bangalore Bombay HC Criticizes ITAT for Delayed Order, Restores Rectification Plea View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930