Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Paras Khurana Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Paras Khurana Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The Delhi ITAT held that mere cancellation of GST registration of suppliers or their non-compliance before the department cannot automatically render purchases bogus. In the case of the assessee, the AO had treated purchases of ₹8.77 crore as suspicious because several suppliers were GST non-filers, their GST registrations stood cancelled and notices issued by the department remained unanswered. However, instead of disallowing the entire purchases, the AO estimated profit element at 10% and made an addition of ₹87.75 lakh. Before the Tribunal, the assessee...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930