Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Vinod Kumar Kansal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Vinod Kumar Kansal (ITAT Delhi) The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld deletion of addition of ₹1.54 crore made on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period. The assessee, a jeweller, explained that the deposits were sourced from recorded cash sales and existing cash balances reflected in regularly maintained books, supported by month-wise cash book, VAT records, stock details and audited financial statements (as seen from the cash flow table reproduced on page 2). The Tribunal noted that purchases, sales, stock movement and VAT turnover were accept...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction Death of Assessee & Missing Records: Mumbai ITAT Limits Bogus Purchase Addition to 8% Profit Element AO Cannot Tax Entire Sale Consideration as Capital Gain Without Allowing Cost of TDR: Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031