Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Srinivas Pampati Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Srinivas Pampati Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

No Capital Gains Taxable on Mere Execution of Development Agreement Without Transfer of Possession – Section 2(47)(v) Not Attracted: ITAT Hyderabad

Both Assessees were joint landowners of 6,380 sq. yds. of land at Karimnagar. On 02.03.2013, they along with two others entered into a Development Agreement-cum-GPA (JDA) with M/s. Shriyam Infrastructure for construction of a multi-storeyed residential complex.

Under the JDA:

  • The total built-up area was 1,28,350 sq. ft.
  • Landowners were to receive 32% &

    Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 151A Breach: ITAT Quashes Reopening, ₹58.68 Cr Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted Full 80P Deduction Upheld as Nominal Members Counted as ‘Members’ Under State Law ITAT Delhi Allows Section 54 Exemption for Property Purchased in Australia Net Agricultural Income Accepted After Tribunal Revises Expense Claim Penalty u/s 271AAC & 270A Remanded as Quantum Appeal Restored for Fresh Hearing View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930