Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Gunjan Gupta Batra (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Gunjan Gupta Batra (ITAT Agra) Capital Balance Explained Through Earlier Year’s ITR – ITAT Agra Upholds Deletion of ₹2.35 Cr Addition Revenue challenged CIT(A)’s order deleting an addition of ₹2.35 crore made by AO as unexplained capital u/s 68. AO held that Assessee had shown sudden capital introduction of ₹2.35 crore in A.Y. 2016-17, whereas no capital was reflected in A.Y. 2015-16 ITR. CIT(A) accepted Assessee’s explanation that the amount represented accumulated savings from prior years, duly assessed & taxed, &  not fresh introduction. He relied on the scruti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930