This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
SSI exemption benefit cannot be denied on use of assigned brand name
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- M/s. Kusum Industries Shri Mithlesh Mathur Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
M/s. Kusum Industries Shri Mithlesh Mathur Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Delhi)
As regards issue (a) above that that appellants are using the brand name of others and they are not entitled to avail the benefit of SSI exemption Notification No. 08/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003, we find that in this, M/s. TCL is issuing purchase order for supply of goods namely, Defoamer under the brand name Neelco. Neelco is the brand of M/s. NASCPL. It is also a fact on record that the appellant is not using the said brand name on their products. Moreover, on the invoices also,...
