In a recent judgement dated 23 July, 2020 in the case of Sunil Rathee & Ors. vs The State of Haryana & Ors., the Apex Court had an opportunity to explain the circumstances when cases can be transferred from High Courts to itself under Article 139A of the Constitution of India.
The Supreme Court has reiterated that ‘dispute’ for the purpose of Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code must truly exist in the facts and spurious, hypothetical and illusory
Whether interest will be levied on availment of excessive subsidies of 25% under Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme-2003 until the whole excessive subsidies are recovered?
In re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (Supreme Court) With reference to the prayer, that the period of validity of a cheque be extended, we find that the said period has not been prescribed by any Statute but it is a period prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India under Section 35A of the Banking […]
Dahiben Vs Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra)(D) Thr Lrs & Ors (Supreme Court) Non Payment of part of Sale Consideration does not make a Sale Deed ‘Void’ nor constitutes a valid ground for Cancellation The Apex Court in the case of Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra)(D) Thr Lrs decided on July 9, 2020 has categorically […]
Aruna Oswal Vs Pankaj Oswal & Ors. (Supreme Court) Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the basis of the petition is the claim by way of inheritance of 1/4th shareholding so as to constitute 10% of the holding, which right cannot be decided in proceedings under section 241/242 of the Act. Thus, filing of the petition […]
The real crux of the case is understanding of Section 43B of the Act and object of legislation behind inserting clause (f) to Section 43B of the Act which has been very clearly explained in detail. Court also stated that that mere inclusion of clause (f) to Section 43B of the Act will not put an embargo or restrictions on the assessee to have the autonomy in the selection of the method of accounting as governing by Section 145 of the Act.
SC directs ICAI on exam opt-outs. Only 52,000 out of 3,46,000 students opt out. Adjournment for ICAI’s draft on concerns. Next hearing on July 2.
Commercial Tax Officer & Anr. Vs Mohan Brewaries and Distrilleries Ltd. (Supreme Court) Appeal filed by the revenue (Civil Appeal No. 7164 of 2013) is partly allowed by holding that the purchase turnover of the empty bottles purchased by the assessee from the unregistered dealers under bought note is exigible to purchase tax under Section […]
An agriculturist could not part his agricultural land to a non-agriculturist through a Will and the prohibition against transfers of holding without the previous sanction of the concerned authorities was to be seen in that light as furthering the cause of legislation.
