Follow Us:

Rajasthan High Court

Sustainability of orders passed by Settlement Commission in violation of section 245D(4) of IT Act, 1961

August 13, 2009 2182 Views 0 comment Print

Chapter XIX-A is a complete Code in itself as regards settlement of cases for having provided a complete mechanism other than procedure provided under the IT Act. Legislature conferred all powers upon Settlement Commission being vested in IT authority under the Act as provided U/s 245-F and what is being decided

Kay Polyplast Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Jodhpur High Court)

May 19, 2008 700 Views 0 comment Print

This appeal has been filed by the assessee, against the judgment of the learned Tribunal, partly allowing the cross objections of the assessee, and remanding the matter to the Commissioner. The remand has been made on the aspect of gross profit rate. However, the learned Commissioner, and the learned Tribunal, upheld the rejection of books of accounts,

Where reasonable explanation is furnished, levy of penalty u/s 271D is not justified

July 26, 2007 2280 Views 0 comment Print

In the instant case, there was no evidence to show that money was loaned or kept deposited for a fixed period or repayable on demand. Further, the sister concerns and the assessee were owned by the same family group of people with a common managing partner with centralised accounts under the same roof

Amount paid by firm to partners or vice versa is not a loan

January 23, 2007 1209 Views 0 comment Print

Under the general provision relating to Partnership Act that partnership firm is not a juristic person and for inter relationship different remedies are provided to enforce the rights arising out of their inter se transactions, the issue about separate entities apart, it cannot be doubted that the assessee has acted bona fide and his plea that inter se transactions

Section 40A(3) Exceptions of Rule 6DD are not exhaustive and must be interpreted liberally

November 7, 2006 6407 Views 0 comment Print

Ordinarily where the Income-tax Officer is satisfied about the genuineness of the transaction and payment and identification of the cash payment is established, the Income-tax Officer shall record his satisfaction about the fulfilment of the conditions for allowing the benefit of Rule 6DD(j). Apparently, Section 40A(3) was intended to penalize the tax evader and not the honest transactions and that is why after framing of Rule 6DD(j)

Defination of terms used in Section 44AB

August 2, 2006 9815 Views 0 comment Print

This appeal is arising out of the order of the Tribunal dt. 27th April, 2001 sustaining the penalty levied against the assessee-appellant under Section 271B for failure on the part of the assessee to get its accounts audited and obtain the report of such audit before the date prescribed under Section 44AB.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031