Rajasthan High Court

Aadhaar Shouldn’t Be a Pre-requisite to Get Food Articles from Ration Shops

Taiyab Khan And Ors Vs State Of Raj And Ors (Rajasthan High Court)

The respondents are directed to ensure that all those who hold a Ration Card are issued the Rations as per the entitlement without insisting upon the holder of the Ration Card obtaining an Aadhar Card. ...

Read More

Neglect to pay despite winding up notice, in law is to be deemed to be insolvent

Balkrishna Commercial Co. Ltd. Vs. Ask Dairies (P.) Ltd. (Rajasthan High Court)

This petition filed by the petitioner company M/s. Shree Balkrishna Commercial Company Limited (hereinafter ‘the petitioner company’) under section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter ‘the Act of 1956’) seeks winding up of the respondent company M/s. Ask Dairies Private Limited (hereinafter ‘the respo...

Read More

Bogus purchases: HC remitted matter back and asked to follow Gujarat HC judgments

Commissioner of Income Tax-Central Vs M/s Carpet Mahal (Rajasthan High Court)

Considering the law declared by the Supreme Court in the case of Vijay Proteins Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.8956/2015 decided on 06.04.2015 whereby the Supreme Court has dismissed the SLP and confirmed the order dated 09.12.2014 passed by the Gujarat High Court and other decisions of the High Court ...

Read More

Interest on FD interest used as LC Margin Money for Industry set-up is taxable as Other Income

CIT Vs M/S Bhawal Synthetics (Rajasthan High Court)

In the case in hand, it is not in dispute that the assessee had income of interest through FDRs and while setting off that the Assessing Officer as well as the ITAT did not examine the aspect as to under which provision the assessee claimed deduction or set off his income from other sources against […]...

Read More

No Benefit under IDS 2016 if Search initiated after launching of scheme

Surendra Pal Singh Sahni Vs The Director General of Income Tax (Rajasthan High Court)

Court be very slow in interpreting the statutes where intention legislature is to curb the evasion of tax. This is a peculiar where the Government has granted the benefit under the only to the persons who are not covered under Section and other proceedings....

Read More

Section 158BC Notice giving insufficient time to file return in invalid

Kumawat Udyog Bus Stand Vs CIT (Rajasthan High Court)

The words mentioned in the SECTION 158bc notice are `within fifteen days’ whereas the provision mandates the time of not less than fifteen days. As notice which was issued by the authority asking the assessee to file the return within fifteen days is not in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act and therefore it is invalid...

Read More

Section 194C- Casual labourer are not sub-contractor : HC

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Shri Tulsi Ram Modi (Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur)

In the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Shri Tulsi Ram Modi, HC of Rajasthan at Jaipur has held that labourer hired by the assessee employed as casual labourers could not be considered to be sub- contractor and therefore provisions of Section 194C and Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act were not applicable....

Read More

No addition for mere sharp decline in G.P ratio in absence of collaborating evidence

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s Hues India Pvt. Ltd. (Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench)

In the case of of Pr. CIT vs. M/s Hues India Pvt. Ltd., High court of Rajasthan bench at Jaipur held that that quantum and penalty proceedings under the Act stand on a different footing and relying on decision in case of CIT v. Gotan Lime Khanij Udyog reported in 2002 (256) ITR 243 and Malani Ramjivan ...

Read More

Fees levied under section 234E is constitutional – Rajasthan HC

M/s Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan Vs UOI (Rajasthan High Court)

In this case the constitutional validity of section 234E of the Act was challenged. Hon’ble HC has followed the decision of Hon’ble Bombay HC in the matter of Rashmikant Kundalia and ors. V/s Union of India & ors. (2015) 229 Taxman 596 (Bom) where the Hon’ble court has upheld the validity of Section 234E of the Income Tax Act...

Read More

Income Tax Dept. filing TDS return after due date

Centralizud Processing Cell (TDS) Vs Shri Surender Mehto (Rajasthan High Court)

28,537 TANs of Government deductors filed their quarterly TDS statement late. 97 Deductors of Income Tax Department have files their quarterly TDS statement late during period from 01.07.2012 to 01.03.2014....

Read More
Page 1 of 512345

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,480)
Company Law (3,398)
Custom Duty (6,601)
DGFT (3,446)
Excise Duty (4,043)
Fema / RBI (3,249)
Finance (3,453)
Income Tax (25,012)
SEBI (2,733)
Service Tax (3,280)