Analysis of Patna High Court’s judgment in Sita Pandey vs. State of Bihar, highlighting tax authorities’ overreach and the need for fair tax collection practices.
Analysis of Patna High Court’s ruling in the Vivek Kumar Mittal Vs State of Bihar case, emphasizing the court’s emphasis on natural justice and principles of fairness in tax assessments.
Explore the intricacies of ACIT Vs Satish Kumar Keshri, a pivotal case by the Patna High Court about the application of Section 153A in Income Tax assessments. Learn about the court’s stand and its implications.
Narayani Industry Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court) The esteemed Patna High Court, in the case of M/s. Narayani Industry v. State of Bihar [Civil Writ Jurisdiction No. 11333 of 2023 dated August 11, 2023], ruled that in instances where a statute prescribes a definite timeframe for the condonation of delay, the Appellate Authority […]
Patna High Court held that as Petitioner failed to furnish satisfactory explanation regarding huge fixed assets and cash available with him, bail application of the Petitioner is rejected.
Mere collection of tax by the selling dealer is not sufficient; the tax must be duly paid to the government. The burden of proof lies with the purchasing dealer to substantiate that the tax collected has indeed been paid to the government by the supplier.
Patna High Court held that as the transaction is purely an inter-state sale of goods and is not a works contract nor a sale of goods exigible to tax within the State of Bihar, the illegal VAT deduction made by the Railways from the bills of the contractors needs to be refunded back.
The Patna High Court dismisses the appeal filed by the Income Tax Department against Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The court deems four years as a reasonable time of limitation for an order under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act.
In a recent judgment, the Calcutta High Court scrutinizes the rejection of a statutory refund application without proper grounds. The court highlights the obligation of timely refund and interest payment and criticizes the conduct of the State Tax Authority. Read the full analysis here.
No penalty under Section 129(3) of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act could be imposed without providing a hearing as prescribed under Section 129(4) of Act.
