Patna High Court rejects second anticipatory bail application filed by Chakresh Kumar Jain under section 4 PMLA, mirroring a similar rejection of an anticipatory bail plea by his father, Pawan Kumar Jain.
Petitioner challenged cancellation of GST registration. HC found that GST Registration cancellation order provided no reasons & violated principles of natural justice.
Patna High Court overturns the cancellation of Nihal Akhtar’s GST registration due to lack of reasons cited, citing principles of natural justice.
Patna High Court held that sub-section (5A) of section 45 inserted by way of an amendment in the Finance Act, 2017, expressly stated to be effective from 01.04.2018 cannot be treated as retrospective.
DEN Networks Limited Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court) HC held that We have to reiterate that the inconsistent provisions in the Bihar State legislations which were sought to be continued for one year or till the amendment or repeal by the respective State Legislatures, by virtue of Section 19 of the 101st Amendment, […]
Petitioner is prevented from availing benefit of stay of recovery of balance amount of tax in terms of Section 112 (8) and (9) of B.G.S.T Act upon deposit of amounts as contemplated under Section 112(8).
Kumar Ram Ranjan Singh Vs State of Bihar (Patna High court) The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs. The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal”) under Section […]
limitation for appeal before GSTAT start only after date on which President, or State President of Tribunal after its constitution under Section 109 of GST enters office.
Due to non-constitution of GSTAT petitioner is deprived of his statutory remedy U/s. 112 of GST Act, so HC granted stay against recovery
Patna High Court held that the petitioner must be extended the statutory benefit of stay under Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act, for he cannot be deprived of the benefit, due to non- constitution of the Tribunal.
