ITAT referred to principle that expenses are allowable in year of crystallization of their liability, even if they relate to an earlier period. It held that expenses crystallized in current assessment year are deductible, regardless of when they were incurred.
Read the full text of ITAT Mumbai’s order in the case of LANXESS India Pvt Ltd vs DCIT, upholding TNMM method over CUP for benchmarking export transactions under manufacturing segment.
In the case of Gopalkrishna Pandu Shetty Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai), deduction under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act is allowed for a property purchased in the wife’s name. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
Discover the ITAT Mumbai’s order directing re-adjudication regarding the liability of property tax paid by Rare Townships Pvt Ltd on behalf of the Collector.
ITAT Mumbai rules penalty under Section 270A deleted as I-T authority failed to consider reasons for difference in sale consideration and stamp duty valuation.
In DCIT Vs Nilesh Shantilal Tank case, Mumbai ITAT confirms 12.5% gross profit margin on alleged bogus purchases as sales remain undisputed. Full text of the order included.
Mumbai ITAT’s ruling in Vijay Suresh Dave Vs DCIT regarding addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68. Detailed analysis of the case and conclusions.
Mumbai ITAT ruling exempts notional interest credited as per accounting standards from taxation, citing real income principle. Details of ACIT vs Kesar Terminals and Infrastructure Ltd.
ITAT considered the justification provided by the assessee, which referenced KITCO and Reuters databases for determining transaction prices. However, the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) argued that the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) should be the primary source for estimating bullion trading prices.
ITAT held that if sales are not disputed and there is no discrepancy between purchases and declared sales, addition should be restricted to bring gross profit on alleged bogus purchases in line with other genuine purchases.
