ITAT Mumbai rules on the appeal by Valuable Technologies regarding the set off of long-term capital loss against capital gains for FY 2020-21.
ITAT Mumbai held that adoption of value of land as determined by the Stamp Duty Authority without referring the valuation to Valuation Officer u/s. 50C of the Income Tax Act unjustified. Accordingly, matter restored for de novo adjudication.
ITAT Mumbai held that the Finance Act, 2022 amended section 14A of the Income Tax Act doesn’t have retrospective effect. The said amended provisions are effective from 1st April 2022.
ITAT Mumbai held that invocation of revisionary proceeding u/s. 263 justified as AO was fully ignorant about verification of unsecure loan and addition of 10% unsecured loan by AO was baseless hence assessment order turned out to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.
ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of Jitendra Vanigota, deleting the ₹595,000 addition under Section 56(2)(x) for AY 2020-21. Learn more about the case details and judgment.
ITAT Mumbai held that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act admissible in respect of the interest on FDR and savings account earned by co-operating housing society from investment with the Co-operative Banks.
ITAT Mumbai remands case on capital gain exemption for two adjoining flats under Section 54F, directing physical verification of flats by the Assessing Officer.
Tata Sons challenges incorrect interest calculation on refunds under Section 244A. ITAT Mumbai directs reassessment of refund and interest for AY 1993-94.
Assessee-bank had calculated tax for the relevant assessment year based on both book profits under Section 115JB at Rs.604,86,39,540 and normal provisions at Rs.1153,29,54,493.
ITAT Mumbai held that when the reserve/provisions created in the year where the assessee has increased the book profit u/s. 115JB of the Act, the assessee is entitled to reduce the amount withdrawn from such reserve if the same is credited to the P & L account in that year.
