The Writ Petitioner prays for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of Order-in-Original dated 21.04.2017 passed by the respondent and quashing of the same as arbitrary and illegal.
The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 1st respondent dated 01.06.2016 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to accept the Return Of Income filed by the petitioner Company for the assessment year 2014-15 under Section 139(1) of the Act.
Petitioner made representations stating that the contract works for which the agreements were executed prior to 01.07.2017 GST cannot be imposed and 2% VAT alone is applicable.
Instant Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the order dated 30.04.2008, passed by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai in Final Order No.434/2008.
V. Venkata Siva Kumar Vs Institute of Cost Accountants of India (Madras High Court) The petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the first respondent to strictly comply with Sec 2(2) of Cost and Works Accountants Act 1959 as amended and desist from encroaching into the domains earmarked for the third respondent (Chartered Accountants) and further […]
In the case of Sun mac Enterprises vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise, the Madras High Court held that inability to pay pre- deposit of 7.5 percent before the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot be a fit ground for invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
While hearing the case between Tvl. Hotel Peacock vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Madras High Court proclaimed in its recent order that penal interest can’t be levied under Tamil Nadu Tax on Luxuries Act 1981 since there is lack of provision.
A division bench of Madras High Court recently invalidated an assessment order against M/s. Cairn India Ltd. The primary object of the Assessee is to carry on exploration and production of oil and gas in India. For this purpose, it had acquired participating interest in various oil and gas blocks.
K.K.Ramesh Vs. Union of India (Madras High Court) By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner seems to have been aggrieved by the improper implementation of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, which were passed during the year 2017. 3. […]
Noor M. Saied Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer (Madras High Court) Petitioner has purchased the property for valuable consideration and in the absence of charge over the property by the Sales Tax Department, the petitioner cannot be made liable to pay alleged arrears of Sales Tax for the defaulting dealer and for such reason, the […]
