Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sun mac Enterprises Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sun mac Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise (Madras High Court)

Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Panel Counsel accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both.

2. The petitioner has challenged an order passed by the respondent dated 27.4.2017, by which, the activity done by the petitioner namely erection, maintenance and repairs of street lights for the use of Municipal Corporation was held to attract levy of service tax. Accordingly, the proposal made in the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. G N Shaikh says:

    UNDER land Acquisition COLLECTOR DID NOT GIVE THE CORRECT COMPENSATION AND REJECTED MY FILE ON THE BASIS OF NOT MAINTANABLE, now can I FILR WRIT PETITION OR APPEAL AGAINST COLLRETORIS IN WRIT PETITION IS PETITIONER HAVE TO Inability to pay Pre- Deposit can’t be ground to entertain a Writ Jurisdiction IS PETITIONER MUST PAY TO CLAIM THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT WITHOUT DEPOSIT PREL UNABLE TO DEPOSIT.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31