Case Law Details
Case Name : Sun mac Enterprises Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Madras High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sun mac Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Panel Counsel accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both.
2. The petitioner has challenged an order passed by the respondent dated 27.4.2017, by which, the activity done by the petitioner namely erection, maintenance and repairs of street lights for the use of Municipal Corporation was held to attract levy of service tax. Accordingly, the proposal made in the show cause notice has been confirmed.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has an appea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
UNDER land Acquisition COLLECTOR DID NOT GIVE THE CORRECT COMPENSATION AND REJECTED MY FILE ON THE BASIS OF NOT MAINTANABLE, now can I FILR WRIT PETITION OR APPEAL AGAINST COLLRETORIS IN WRIT PETITION IS PETITIONER HAVE TO Inability to pay Pre- Deposit can’t be ground to entertain a Writ Jurisdiction IS PETITIONER MUST PAY TO CLAIM THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT WITHOUT DEPOSIT PREL UNABLE TO DEPOSIT.