Principal CIT Vs Smt. Charumathi Seshadri (Madras High Court) When assessee invested a sum in purchase of land, which was invested after date of sale of original asset and before due date of filing of return of income under section 139(1) as per requirement of section 54F, then, deduction under section 54F could not be […]
Employees contribution towards EPF and ESI was rightly disallowed by AO as payment was made beyond the due date stipulated under the relevant enactment for making such payment u/s 36(1)(va)
M/s. Caterpillar India Pvt Ltd Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) According to the respondents in all writ petitions, the confiscation of the goods is perfectly in order as the petitioners have, admittedly, transported the consignments without valid E-way bills, thus violating clause (iv) of Section 130(1) above being, a contravention of the Act/Rules […]
PRESS RELEASE Result declared for DECEMBER – 2018 term of examination Kolkata: The Institute conducts Foundation / Intermediate / Final Examination twice in a year i.e. in June and December. The results of December 2018 term of Examination of The Institute of Cost Accountants of India have been declared on 21/02/2019. Result Analysis of The […]
Tvl. R K Motors Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) It is also not in dispute that the bill is addressed only to the writ petitioner’s principal office at Sivakasi; delivery alone is to be made at Virudhunagar. I am of the view that even if by mistake, a wrong instruction had been given to the driver of the vehicle to head towards Sivakasi. Still it would not really matter. The only question that the respondent ought to have posed is […]
Madras High Court has directed Commissioner of commercial tax in the case of M/s. Jeyyam Global Foods (P) Ltd. Vs Union of India to instruct his officers not to detain goods / conveyances for classification disputes.
M/s. Ayyan Fireworks Factory (P) Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)-I (FAC) (Madras High Court) Reopening of assessment on mere Audit Party Opinion without disposing Objection of Assesee is not valid The Assessing Officer has to independently record his view for such reopening if he proposes to reopen and thereafter, notice has to be issued to […]
Rejection of IGST refund without considering assessee’s reply and also without affording an opportunity of personal hearing was in violation of the principles of natural justice. Therefore, matter was remanded back for reconsideration to decide the refund claim on merits within the stipulated period.
CIT Vs Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd. (High Court Madras) n order to get over the legal embargo which permitted such expense to be allowable as a deduction, the Income Tax Act was amended and Section 35DDA was introduced by Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f 01.04.2001. Thus, in our considered view, the Tribunal was justified in setting aside […]
Zeenath International Supplies Vs CIT (High Court Madras) Sub-Section (9) of Section 139 of the Act is beneficial provision to the assessee, which provides them an opportunity to rectify the defects. Since the intention being that the assessment proceedings are an outcome of dialogue and discussion, the Assessing Officer is entitled to clarify all issues by issuing notice to the assessee and calling upon them to produce […]
