The ITAT Rajkot condoned a 518-day delay for Arham Enterprise, setting aside an ex parte CIT(A) order. The tribunal’s decision prioritizes a case’s merits over technicalities.
The ITAT Rajkot set aside a CIT(A) order against Prataprai Ranpariya, ruling that the ex-parte dismissal violated principles of natural justice. The Tribunal remanded the matter for a fresh hearing, imposing a Rs.2,000 cost on the assessee for non-compliance.
The ITAT Rajkot has deleted a disallowance under Section 40A(3), ruling that the provision applies to individual payments against a single bill, not the aggregate of multiple payments below Rs. 20,000 each.
The ITAT in Rajkot reduced a penalty against a taxpayer from ₹30,000 to ₹10,000, ruling that a single penalty should be levied for multiple non-compliances that occurred during the same proceedings.
ITAT Rajkot held that appellate authorities have power to entertain fresh claim and accordingly, claim of erroneously addition to computation of income accepted and direction given to AO to determine taxable income of assessee afresh.
ITAT Rajkot held that imposition of penalty u/s. 271B of the Income Tax Act for not getting books of accounts audited cannot be sustained since assessee has filed return u/s. 44AD and there is no need to maintain books of accounts u/s. 44AD.
Discover why Rajkot’s ITAT granted 80G approval to Kabir Kirti Mandir Kashi, ruling that a trust’s religious objects don’t override its charitable purpose.
ITAT Rajkot has quashed a PCIT’s order to tax interest on enhanced land compensation, holding it is part of compensation and not taxable as income from other sources.
ITAT Rajkot quashes a Section 263 order, ruling that the PCIT cannot revise an assessment based on a mere change of opinion when the AO has verified purchases.
ITAT Rajkot allows an appeal despite manual filing and delay, prioritizing a fair hearing over procedural errors and remanding the case for re-adjudication.
