Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Haresh J Rathod Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Haresh J Rathod Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Conclusion: Once assessee had filed the Return of Income, in response to notice, u/s 142(1), (although it was late), then it was mandatory for AO, in order to acquire the jurisdiction, to make the assessment on the assessee, to issue the notice u/s 143(2). Held: In the instant case, the notice u/s 142(1) had been issued on 19/12/2017 requiring assessee to file return of income on or before 18/01/2018. However, assessee filed return of income beyond the time limit specified in notice u/s 142(1) of the Act on 03/06/2019. Therefore, the issue arose for conside...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930